It’s game on for sports gambling in New Jersey, and possibly the rest of the country too.
The state of New Jersey won its US Supreme Court case, as a vast majority of justices announced that the federal ban on sports wagering is unconstitutional.
More on the backstory of NJ sports betting and the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act here. Previously, single-game wagering was legal in the US only through the Nevada sports gambling industry.
Here is the conclusion of the Vast Majority opinion:
The legalization of sports gambling requires an important policy decision, but the decision is not ours to make. Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but when it elects not to do so, each State is free to act by itself. Our job is to interpret the legislation Congress has enacted and choose whether it is consistent with the Constitution. PASPA isn’t. PASPA”regulate[s] state governments’ regulation” of their citizens. …. The Constitution gives Congress no power. The conclusion of the Third Circuit is reversed.
The court stated it reversed the decision of Appeals. Complete opinion here.
SCOTUS affects on sports gambling The real world software of this verdict:
New Jersey can now move forward with its plans to legalize wagering. Some gambling centers in the country have suggested it could be only a matter of weeks before sportsbooks are surgeries. William Hill has said in the past it would be live within weeks at Monmouth Park.
West Virginia sports gambling and Mississippi sports gambling are also well prepared to move forward with legislation on the books.
So can Pennsylvania, that legalized sports wagering in 2017. A PA sports betting rollout there is up in the air, but could come later this season.
Sports betting legislation advancing in several of states might take effect immediately upon passage.
New Jersey appears set to proceed with legislation to regulate sports betting, now that PASPA is gone. Its first law is what amounts to a”partial repeal” of its own sports gambling prohibition, with unregulated wagering able to happen at the country’s tracks and casinos.
The New Jersey Department of Gaming Enforcement, which will oversee sports betting in the country, had no comment regarding the conclusion from SCOTUS today.
A quick timeline of the Situation New Jersey enacted a law in 2014 in which it partially repealed its sports betting ban. That law was an attempt to allow the nation’s casinos and horse betting tracks to offer sports wagering by working around a federal law, the skilled and Amateur Sports Protection Act. That law bans single-game wagering out of Nevada sports gambling.
The NCAA and the leading US professional sports leagues — NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL — and all the NCAA filed suit to stop the law from taking effect. The leagues have standing under PASPA to bring suits which authorize sports betting.
Over the following 3 years, New Jersey lost in the federal district court and the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals. New Jersey then appealed the case to the US Supreme Court. The Supreme Court agreed to listen to New Jersey’s allure in the summer of 2017.
Oral arguments took place in December; several considered the hour of dialogue between justices and counsel went well for New Jersey.
More from the sports gambling decision
The choice in the event clocked in at 49 pages. Six justices joined the vast majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito. It had been joined by:
Chief Justice John Roberts
Justice Anthony Kennedy
Justice Elana Kagan
Justice Neil Gorsuch
Justice Clarence Thomas
Justice Stephen Breyer concurred with the majority in a different opinion, while justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented. Breyer also joined the dissent in part.
The top notch takeaways
The vast majority opinion is pretty unequivocal in stating that PASPA is unconstitutional. Here is the quick digest of what SCOTUS really said about PASPA in terms of the law:
When a State partially or completely repeals old laws banning sports betting strategies, it”authorize[s]” those approaches under PASPA.
PASPA’s provision forbidding state authorization of sports gambling schemes violates the anticommandeering rule.
PASPA’s provision prohibiting state”licens[ing]” of sports betting schemes also violates the anticommandeering rule. It matters a direct order to the state legislature and suffers from the same flaw as the prohibition of state authorization. Therefore, this Court need not determine whether New Jersey’s 2014 law violates PASPA’s antilicensing provision.
No provision of PASPA is severable from the provisions right at issue.
The bottom line: PASPA is background.
Alito gives us a short history of gaming in the US and PASPA before getting into the questions of legislation which were placed in front of the court.
Alito stated the idea that Congress had in mind exactly what NJ did — a partial repeal — is dubious:
The Third Circuit couldn’t say that, if any, partial repeals are allowed. The United States of America tell us that the PASPA ban state authorization permits complete repeals, but past that they identify no clear line. It’s improbable that Congress meant to enact this kind of nebulous regime.
The state had argued that PASPA commandeered the nation into keeping its prohibition on the books. And the court, via Alito, agreed.
The PASPA supply at issue here–prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling–violates the anticommandeering rule. That supply unequivocally dictates what a state legislature may and might not do.
Reaction to the NJ sports gambling case
This is some response from corners:
American Gaming Association
“Today’s decision is a victory for the millions of Americans who attempt to wager on sports in a safe and regulated way. According to a Washington Post poll, a solid 55 percent of Americans believe it is time to end the federal ban on sports gambling. Today’s ruling makes it possible for countries and sovereign tribal nations to give Americans what they need: an open, transparent, and responsible market for sports betting.
Through clever, efficient regulation this new marketplace will protect consumers, maintain the integrity of the games we love, enable law enforcement to fight illegal gaming, and generate new revenue for states, sporting bodies, broadcasters and many others. The AGA stands prepared to work together with stakeholders — states, tribes, sports leagues, and law enforcement — to make a new regulatory environment that capitalizes on this chance to participate fans and boost local economies.”
The NFL’s longstanding and unwavering commitment to protecting the integrity of the sport remains absolute. Congress has long-recognized the potential harms posed by sports betting to the ethics of sporting competitions and the public confidence in these events. Given that history, we mean to call on Congress again, this time to reevaluate a core regulatory framework for legalized sports gambling. We will work together with our clubs to make certain that any state attempts that move forward in the meantime protect our fans and the ethics of our sport.
“Today the United States Supreme Court issued a clear decision that PASPA is unconstitutional, reversing the lower courts that held otherwise. While we’re still reviewing the decision to understand the overall implications to school sports, we’ll adjust sports wagering and championship policies to align with the direction from the courtroom.”
Commissioner Adam Silver:
“Today’s decision by the Supreme Court opens the door for states to pass legislation legalizing sports gambling. We stay in favor of a national framework that would provide a uniform way of sports betting in countries that choose to permit it, but we will remain active in continuing talks with state legislatures. Regardless of the particulars of any future sports gambling law, the ethics of our game remains our greatest priority.”
Along with the players’ association:
“Today’s decision by the Supreme Court will significantly impact our game — indeed, all sports in this country. The NBPA is going to frequently together with the other sports marriages work to ensure that our players’ rights are safeguarded and promoted as we venture into this new land.”
Major League Baseball
“Today’s decision by the Supreme Court will have deep effects on Major League Baseball. As every nation considers whether to allow sports betting, we will continue to seek out the appropriate protections for our game, in partnership with other professional sports. Our most important priority is protecting the integrity of the games. We’ll continue to support legislation that promotes air-tight partnerships and coordination between the state, the casino operators, as well as the governing bodies in sports toward this objective.”
And the players’ association:
“The Court’s decision is massive, with far-reaching implications for baseball players and the game we love. From complicated intellectual property inquiries to the most basic issues of gamers safety, the realities of widespread sports betting must be addressed and thoughtfully to avoid placing our sport’s integrity in danger as conditions proceed with legalization.”
“Following the Supreme Court’s ruling now, the PGA TOUR reiterates its support of the law of sports betting in a secure and responsible way. We think that law is the best way of ensuring integrity in competition, protecting consumers, engaging enthusiasts and generating revenue for authorities, leagues and operators. We stay aligned with the NBA and MLB in this area, and we are going to continue with our collective efforts to work with legislators, regulators, operators and others in the sector on regulation that serves the interests of all involved.”
The no. 2 guy under MGM Resorts CEO Jim Murren talked to Bloomberg:
“We believe in the next two years to three decades, there are 10 to 12 countries that are ripe and ready to activate on that,” MGM President William Hornbuckle said. “We will be there. We’ll participate in it. We bring technology. We bring awareness. And in this space, we bring hope .”
Itai Frieberger, CEO of 888:
“888 has been keeping a very close eye on regulatory developments in america and welcomes today’s announcement as a significant step forward in the possible regulation of the US marketplace. The capacity for sports gambling in the united states is significant and, as the only operator at all three controlled US states*, we believe 888 is uniquely positioned to exploit the potential growth opportunities in america marketplace that today’s judgment opens up.”
Rep. Frank Pallone
Pallone is a Congressman from New Jersey who has championed sports gambling bills at the federal level:
“The Supreme Court’s ruling is a triumph for New Jersey and the rest of the country. PASPA was clearly unconstitutional, and the ban on sports betting has now rightfully been rejected by the Court. I’ve long thought that New Jersey should have the opportunity to go with sports gambling. Now the Supreme Court has struck down this unlawful and confusing law, now is the time for Congress to maneuver the GAME Act ahead to make sure that consumer protections are set up in almost any state that decides to execute sports betting.”
Rep. Dina Titus
Titus represents Nevada in Congress.
“Today the Supreme Court has confirmed states’ rights in regards to sports gambling and opened the door for controlled sports gambling in states throughout the country,” said Representative Titus. “A controlled market is obviously better than an unregulated one. As the representative for Las Vegas I’ve seen the success of this flourishing, regulated sports gambling market in Nevada. The skilled and Amateur Sports Protection Act has spawned a $150 billion yearly illegal sports gambling market that lacks customer protections, is ripe for manipulation, fuels other illegal actions, and jeopardizes the integrity of sports leagues.
In the forthcoming weeks, I will be working together with key stakeholders and industry experts to help educate my colleagues on what this means for their states and what they are able to learn from the golden standard set in Nevada. Allowing countries and tribal sovereign governments to legalize sports gambling could boost local markets, increase state revenues, and better protect both customers and the industry, with Nevada revealing how. Las Vegas will still be the premier destination for sports betting, and Nevada can export its own expertise. The Supreme Court today also sends a clear message to the Department of Justice that can be applied to other nations’ rights issues like marijuana.”
This is Sen. John Bonacic, Who’s sponsoring legislation to legalize wagering in his nation:
“New York was preparing for this moment since as far back as 2013 and now we’ve remained proactive in anticipation of the decision by the Court. The Senate Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee held a public hearing in January that brought together stakeholders from throughout the gaming spectrum to discuss this issue in depth.
Since that time, I’ve introduced legislation which has passed committee and proceeded to have productive discussions regarding the issue. I’m confident that working with my colleagues in both the Senate and Assembly, we may have a bill ready for Governor’s signature by the end of the session”
“We see sports gambling as a possible amenity that would complement our numerous offerings. Now the Court has ruled, we anticipate engaging in a conversation with fellow tribal leaders, policymakers, and industry stakeholders to find out if there is a path forward for sports betting from California.”
California Nations Indian Gaming Association
Chairman Steve Stallings:
Moving ahead it will take a change to the California Constitution to permit any kind of sports wagering. In doing this, we’d advise the country to move slowly and cautiously and examine all angles as it relates to sports gambling. As the state of California weighs the decision of whether to permit for the practice of sports wagering, we firmly request that tribes have a place in the table in any and all discussions surrounding the issue.
In addition, we want to make quite clear that California voters have, on numerous occasions, confirmed the exclusive right of California tribal authorities to run casino-style games. Legalization of sports betting should not become a back-door way to infringe upon that exclusivity.
A powerful, well-regulated gaming industry is of utmost importance to California’s tribal governments and the general public. Assessing the integrity of the gaming industry protects California and is our authentic North Star that guides all of our stances and conclusion DraftKings and FanDuel
Both daily fantasy sports sites are eyeing legal sports wagering and that interest will increase today. DraftKings had already declared its intention to offer sports wagering:
“The Supreme Court’s conclusion, which paves the way for states to legalize sports gambling, creates an enormous opportunity for FanDuel as our stage, brand, and customer base supply a unique and persuasive base to participate.
At our core, we’re a business that makes sports more exciting. In the exact same way we revolutionized fantasy sports, we’ll bring innovation to the sport betting space. This decision allows us to attract the passion and engagement we’ve observed one of our users to new and enlarged marketplaces and make a sports gaming product which fans will love. FanDuel is and will continue to be the premier mobile destination for every sports enthusiast.”
DraftKings CEO Jason Robins:
“Our mission has always been to bring fans closer to the sport that they love and now, due to the wisdom of the Supreme Court, DraftKings is going to have the ability to exploit our proven technology to provide our clients with revolutionary online sports gambling products. This ruling gives us the ability to further enhance our product offerings and build on our distinctive capability to drive fan engagement.”
Read more: parkviewpantherfootball.com